🧬 Sachs Protein Signaling
Overview
Single-cell flow cytometry measurements of 11 phosphoproteins across 5,400 T-cells under 9 experimental conditions, from the landmark causal inference benchmark by Sachs et al. (2005).
Data Structure
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Proteins | Raf, Mek, Erk, Akt, PKA, PKC, P38, Jnk, Plcg, PIP2, PIP3 |
| Cells | 5,400 (1,800 observational + 3,600 interventional) |
| Conditions | 6 (1 observational + 5 interventional reagents) |
| Ground-Truth DAG | 18 signed causal edges (17 Sachs consensus arcs + PIP3 to Akt) |
| Citations | Sachs et al., Science 308:523-529 (2005); Guo & Dong, Linear Causal Discovery with Interventional Constraints (2025) |
Causal Reasoning Model
The engine uses a signed ground-truth graph: each edge is either activating (high parent drives high child) or inhibitory (high parent drives low child). Topology follows Sachs et al. (2005) Table 3; edge signs follow the literature-curated interactions in Guo & Dong (2025) Table 5.
Three signaling pathways comprise the network:
1. MAPK Cascade: PKC activates Raf and Mek; Raf activates Mek; Mek activates Erk. 2. PKA hub (mostly inhibitory): PKA inhibits Raf (Ser259/14-3-3), Mek (net, via Raf), P38, Akt, and Jnk. Only PKA to Erk is modelled as activating. 3. Lipid signaling: Plcg to PIP3/PIP2; PIP3 to PIP2; PIP3 activates Akt.
Edge Provenance
| Edge | Sign | Source |
|---|---|---|
| PKA to Raf | inhibits | Häfner 1994; Dumaz & Marais 2003 (Ser259 / 14-3-3) |
| PKA to Mek | inhibits | Net effect via Raf, Sachs 2005 Table 3 (indirect arc) |
| PKA to P38 | inhibits | Metz et al. 2021 |
| PKA to Akt | inhibits | Intervention arm (Akt LOW in 489/600 PKA cells); not yet literature-curated |
| PKA to Jnk | inhibits | Intervention arm (Jnk LOW in 600/600 PKA cells); not yet literature-curated |
| PKC to Mek | activates | Sachs 2005 Table 3 (via Raf S497/S499) |
| PIP3 to Akt | activates | Reactome R-HSA-1257604 (well established; not recovered by Sachs' algorithm) |
| all others | activate | Sachs 2005 consensus / Guo & Dong 2025 Table 5 |
Note: PKA to Akt and PKA to Jnk signs are data-derived from the intervention arm, not from a curated literature source (Sachs lists both as indirect arcs without a sign; Guo & Dong do not include them). They are flagged here for domain confirmation, though the interventional evidence is unambiguous.
Benchmark Significance
This is the most widely cited benchmark dataset in causal discovery. The logic engine reasons over the signed DAG and detects cells whose protein levels contradict the expected signed direction. Under PKA activation, low Raf/Mek/P38/Akt/Jnk is the expected cascade shutdown, so only ~22% of PKA cells are anomalous: those where a target escaped suppression (e.g. Raf or P38 stays HIGH) or where Erk unexpectedly dropped.
Sample Questions
- "Why does this cell show high Erk despite Mek inhibition?"
- "What causes signaling anomalies under PKA activation?"
- "Which cells violate the MAPK cascade?"
Try It
Ask GemLogic: Why do cells under PKA activation show low Raf and Mek levels?
Start Session →